Buckle up…and recap this actual quick.
Massive U went reside with hearth in his voice and the FBI on his tail. Simply hours earlier than turning himself in, the longtime Los Angeles determine jumped on Instagram and accused Wack 100 of the worst of the worst. He claimed that when federal brokers raided his properties, they had been requested particularly about “Wack” and “Luce Cannon.” And the web went hog wild. Then he went even additional.
In accordance with Massive U, “Wack mentioned 100 instances he was going to take my contracts. He working with the FBI.” Whereas on the run, he alleged that federal authorities went to metropolis officers and celebrities telling them to not give him cash or assist. “They going round scaring and intimidating everyone,” he mentioned, framing the scenario as a coordinated effort to isolate him financially and politically.
Massive U, at present within the massive home, insisted he had finished nothing improper and described the raids. He mentioned doorways had been kicked in and his son was contacted at soccer observe.
“This the value of being black and attempting to assist any person, attempting to assist your neighborhood,” he mentioned, framing it as an assault. “I’m going to go flip myself in although cuz I ain’t did nothing.” Nicely, individuals weren’t in settlement with that.
Wack 100 doesn’t agree both.
Responding on social media, Wack flatly denied the claims and mentioned his authorized workforce has been urging him for months to take motion.
“We’d like a press release retracting what he mentioned, what you recognize is fake,” Wack acknowledged. He additionally claimed that in federal courtroom it was placed on file that authorities have “by no means talked to, handled, communicated, spoke with Wack 100 or 600 regard any of this stuff.”
Wack made it clear that if a retraction doesn’t come inside the subsequent 10 to 30 days, his legal professionals will transfer ahead.
“I’m going to be pressured to go at any and all the pieces. Catalogs, actual property, no matter he may need any kind of possession of possession of,” he warned, framing the scenario as enterprise safety, not private vendetta. Some mentioned that this was an effort to additional bleed Massive U of assets to struggle his actual case, which is the R.I.C.O., however who is aware of.
Will there be a retraction?
Associated