
The drama between the Selling Sunset stars began after Chrishell acknowledged she was “triggered” over Bre’s alleged assist of MAGA, and accused Tiesi of referring to her companion G-Flip — who’s non-binary — by a transphobic slur.
Whereas Season 9 of Selling Sunset doable is not going to be launched until later this 12 months, stars Chrishell Stause and Bre Tiesi are nonetheless defending the strong drama alive off-screen.
The precise property brokers grew to turn out to be embroiled in a feud this week after Stause, 43, known as out Tiesi, 33, for displaying to level out assist for President Trump’s MAGA after she posted {a photograph} of newest bracelets, and likewise accused Bre of referring to her companion G-Flip by a transphobic slur.
Nonetheless, consistent with Tiesi, she’s “faraway from” a MAGA supporter and unintentionally tagged the improper jewelry mannequin.
Be taught on for a full breakdown of the feud.
YouTube/Getty
Chrishell Stause Admits Shading Tom Sandoval by Leaving Him Out of Traitors Submit: ‘I Hate Him’
View Story
Chrishell Will get ‘Triggered,’ Calls Out Bre Over Alleged ‘Slurs’
The drama began earlier this week after Tiesi shared {a photograph} on her Instagram Tales, throughout which she gushed over new diamond bracelets she obtained from a jewelry mannequin, along with an evil eye bracelet. And as confirmed in a card that accompanied her reward, the mannequin was seemingly known as “MAGA bracelets.”
“Thanks @magabracelets need extra security recently,” Tiesi wrote alongside the {photograph} of her new bling, per Us Weekly.
On Tuesday, Stause known as out Tiesi on her private Instagram Tales, saying she was “triggered” by her put up and apparent revelation that she helps Trump’s “Make America Good As soon as extra” movement.
“Some individuals are GREAT for tv, nevertheless with regards to talking about our precise factors (using slurs and so forth) they’re often decrease. So use this as a suggestion when you watch season 9,” Chrishell wrote, resharing Bre’s put up.
In a follow-up put as much as her IG Tales, the Oppenheim Group precise property agent acknowledged her points with Tiesi go rather a lot deeper than whether or not or not or not she’s a Trump supporter.
Stause shared a screenshot from an April 2024 Of us article about Tiesi being sued by her former staff, who declare she “harassed, discriminated in opposition to, and/or retaliated in opposition to [them] on the premise of their intercourse, gender, and/or sexual orientation,” which Bre has denied.
“Discovering out how she referred to my companion will not be going to make the current, nevertheless no this isn’t solely a political issue to those saying that,” Chrishell wrote alongside the screenshot, referring to her companion, G-Flip, who’s non-binary.
“Nevertheless her posting that triggered me since we would have liked to tip-toe around the true factors whereas filming bc of this lawsuit,” she claimed. “Should you occur to switch like this when cameras aren’t spherical, switch like this IN FRONT of the cameras.”
Instagram
Bre Denies Chrishell’s Claims About Bracelets
Tiesi addressed Stause’s claims, sharing a put up on her IG Tales shortly Tuesday. According to Bre, she made a mistake and tagged the improper mannequin in her put up, and claimed she’s not a MAGA supporter.
“I don’t politically talk on opinions ever and I’m faraway from MAGA,” Tiesi wrote. “I can’t apologi[z]e enough for the oversight proper right here. I’ve a full social media crew that assist me day-to-day and the bracelet was gifted by @lavaraverse and by no means the mannequin that was tagged.”
“All of us make errors and when tagging the grand this was not propelery researched into guaranteeing the proper mannequin was being tagged,” she continued.
“No particular person have to be taking my story and assuming I suggest one factor else with out content material materials for his or her very personal revenue, rising up I always wore the eye of Horus and it’s meant to represent security and therapeutic so I apologise that this story has been shared with out the entire story from myself and this error gained’t ever happen as soon as extra,” Bre added, concluding her message by writing that “hopefully this has cleared up any misunderstanding.”
Instagram
She went on to share what looked to be a screenshot of an Instagram DM with an individual, throughout which Tiesi allegedly wrote that she was “about to flip” on account of they didn’t discover she was gifted a “MAGA bracelet,” per Model of Actuality.
Inside the alternate, the person allegedly replied that the jeweler beforehand had a “MAGA line,” nevertheless “merely branded” Lavara Verse and felt “horrible” over the alleged mixup.
“I instructed her she should put these beneath the alternative mannequin on account of they’re so gorgeous nevertheless very limiting significantly bc they’re evil eyes, not maga associated,” the person added, per the screenshot.
Bre moreover posted what was seemingly one different screenshot of a DM, exhibiting an alleged message that influencer Jennifer Stano despatched to Chrishell, consistent with Us Weekly.
Per the {photograph}, Stano defended Tiesi, telling Stause that she felt the “should go to bat for Bre on account of it’s a large misunderstanding.” Jennifer allegedly wrote that she linked Bre with Lavara Verse’s Nicola “Coco” Verses after Stano wore the designer’s evil eye bracelets.
“Coco supplied to ship her some and they also exchanged information,” Stano wrote to Stause, consistent with the screenshot. “Because of La Verse is mannequin new, Coco solely had thanks taking part in playing cards from her older agency, Maga Bracelets. The bracelets have been from La Verse, nevertheless the packing nonetheless acknowledged Maga.”
“None of us anticipated Bre to place up, nevertheless she did, and we’ve got been every so grateful,” she added. “It was merely the improper agency tagged and now she’s getting backlash for one factor that wasn’t her fault. Merely wished to clear that up.”
Instagram
Chrishell Slams Bre’s ‘Excuse’
Stause hit once more at Tiesi, reacting to Bre’s extended apology assertion on her Instagram Tales.
“I merely observed her excuse,” she wrote. “OK she ”tagged the improper mannequin’ though it’s all of the similar agency and MAGA was HIGHLY featured correct subsequent to her wrist.”
Chrishell posted a screenshot of a highlighted definition of “transvestite,” seemingly suggesting this was the offensive time interval Bre allegedly directed at G-Flip.
The definition acknowledged transvestite as an “outdated and typically considered offensive time interval for any individual who apparel in garments traditionally associated to the opposite gender, additionally known as a cross-dress.”
“Not my job to indicate her that this time interval is EXTREMELY outdated, nevertheless proper right here’s a free coaching,” Stause added, alongside the screenshot. “And if my companion WAS trans, they aren’t, I’d luckily love them exactly the similar. GTFOH. Someone take my phone.”
Instagram
Provide Blasts ‘Assault’ on Bre’s Character
On Wednesday, a provide acknowledged in a press launch to Us Weekly that Tiesi has “no intention of reacting extra to the unfounded claims,” and “assault [on] her character.
“Bre addressed the accusations all through social media, Bre is on the excessive of her recreation correct now, and loads of the strong are nervous about what [has] and what has not been included throughout the subsequent sequence edit on account of many failed makes an try to assault her character with zero response from Bre,” the insider acknowledged.
“She accepted the bracelet reward from a buddy who will also be part of the LGBTQIA+ group and was totally taken once more by the associations and the branding of a well-known historic picture,” the provision added. “She has utterly no intention of reacting extra to the unfounded claims and manufacturing are behind her completely.”
Tiesi has however to the touch upon Stause’s claims about Bre’s alleged suggestions about G-Flip.